![]() ![]() Some things fall through the cracks or only get fixed when rediscovered by us or someone else, I'm sure, but that's going to be normal, and we'd never ban someone just for reporting a bug. Our forum and release notes speak for themselves in terms of responding to things people report. If you're someone else, I'm not sure what you're referring to, but we only ban people who are extremely, repeatedly rude, or who repeatedly spread disinformation or hassle us or other users to get their way over some pet issue, or who turn out to be pirates. So, no need to elaborate about this here any further.Īssuming you use the same name, The Gandalf account on our forum is not banned and I can't see anything even controversial in any of the threads. That said, there are enough threads on this forum about XY being only 32 bit. NET, but *not* about VB6 at all, wich is the language XY is written in. Glad to know, that Don is not like that.)īTW, about these 2 links at the bottom of your post: While it is true, that the one big super-old-old-archaic screenshot from 1995 on one of these 2 sites is misleading, as far as I can see it, both articles only talk about. (BTW, for such a post, as you, Lare2, wrote it, you would already get banned from the DO forum. Still, since your post almost reads like a commercial for DO and an anti-commercial for XY, I had to comment on that to give also a different, balancing opinion. Of course, everybody is entitled to his/her personal opinion and so are you, Lare2. Overall, considering that the bugs not fixed are always side issues (and bugs not getting fixed is also true of most other apps I know, including DO) and XY doing its core job very nicely and mostly fast, then also considering how one is treated over at the DO forum and comparing the cost-benefit relation, I personally came to the conclusion that I am better off with XY. I had my problems with the latter for a while but eventually came to accept that this is how it is (and therefore have mostly stopped reporting non-essential bugs). Often Don, the developer, is very quick to fix it, sometimes it won't get fixed for any kind of reason. every now and then some feature all of a sudden does not work the way it did in the past or as you would expect for other reasons. It does have its little bugs or places of potential improvement, e.g. In my experience XY is super stable and has always treated my data in a friendly way. That said, stability, as you, Lare2, meant it would be an issue, IMHO certainly is *not* one of its issues. Like most apps, though, it too has its pros and cons. Regarding XYplorer, XY certainly is unique in many ways. Would prefer to never have contact with them again. What is more, this so praised Leo of yours, Lare2, and his colleagues are literally among the *most* unfriendly and "hiding the truth under the carpet"-people I have ever had personal contact (in this case in their forum) with in my life and by now I am over 40 years old. Especially regarding stability/reliability, not saying that DO is particularly unstable, but I had more crashes with DO than with XY, as far as I can remember. Regarding Directory Opus, here I really have to comment on what you wrote. I tried it some times but never could handle it quite the way that it made sense to me. My impression is: A veteran of file management. Regarding Total Commander, I don't know Total Commander as well. I want to give my two cents on all of them. As a paid Customer of Total Commander (Since what seems a lifetime LOL), XYplorer (Lifetime Licence) and Directory Opus. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |